3D Printing and Its Biological Impacts

POSTED BY   James Dearsley
24th May 2017
3D Printing and Its Biological Impacts

3D Printing and Its Biological Impacts

There is no doubt that 3D Printing has some amazing potential. We can use it to build new homes (on Mars) and even 3D print cheese – American cheese it has to be said, so I am not sure what the French would say, but still, we can 3D Print cheese.

3D Printing and Its Biological Impacts

3D Print Ovaries for Mice

However, this week the news around the topic of 3D Printing was dominated by scientists who have been able to 3D print ovaries for mice who had had their own removed. So successful was the project, that the mice ovulated and indeed produced healthy mice pups.

It is no surprise that the news was awash with these stories given the significance of this finding as you can see from the image above.

Interestingly, however, this was not the first biosynthetic ovary, but it was the first to be built using a gelatin scaffolding which was said to be key to the success of the experiment.  Gelatin, made from broken-down collagen, is rigid enough to be manipulated during surgery, but porous enough to allow it to properly interact with the mouse’s biology.

Snagging Points and Developments

Previous efforts used gel substances to encapsulate egg cells, but they were, unfortunately, prone to breaking down and collapsing upon themselves. The scaffolding provided a much more stable environment that gave the follicles a higher rate of survival.

Another aspect that they deemed critical was the temperature of the 3D Print itself, which I find particularly interesting:

“…we found a gelatin temperature that allows it to be self-supporting, not collapse, and lead to building multiple layers. No one else has been able to print gelatin with such well-defined and self-supported geometry.”

Whilst it has no doubt taken decades to get to this point, it will no doubt take further time to consider this on humans but still, this is a huge proof of concept and one that will no doubt be discussed for years to come. Not just because of the technology but because of the ethics of the whole situation.

To summarise, consider the power of the statement made by co-author Teresa Woodruff, a reproductive scientist and director of the Women’s Health Research Institute at Feinberg, who stated: 

Using bioengineering, instead of transplanting from a cadaver, to create organ structures that function and restore the health of that tissue for that person, is the holy grail of bioengineering for regenerative medicine,”

You can read the whole statement here.

3D Printing and Its Biological Impacts

James Dearsley

James Dearsley is the Founder and MD of TDMB. In addition to his work with us, he is also a renowned expert in PropTech, and was recently voted the most influential person in PropTech. An impassioned speaker and advocate of technology, particularly in the Property industry, his other interests include beekeeping, real ale, green trousers, and (currently) growing a beard. You can contact James directly via Twitter or LinkedIn, or tweet the TDMB team directly.

Get in Touch With James Dearsley


You may also like

The Navy Now Has 3D Printed Submarines
7th August 2017
3D Printing
How 3D Printed Models Are Changing Architectural Design
26th June 2017
3D Printing
Build a House…From Your Printer
18th May 2017
3D Printing